![]() ![]() Authors sometimes rely on the fact that they will always have an opportunity to address their work’s shortcomings after the feedback received from the journal editor and reviewers has identified them.Ī proactive approach and attitude will reduce the chance of rejection and disappointment. This secret does not entail submitting your manuscript for publication the moment you have crafted its conclusion. In my first article for Elsevier Connect – “ Five secrets to surviving (and thriving in) a PhD program” – I emphasized that scholars should start writing during the early stages of your research or doctoral study career. Do not rush submitting your article for publication. Furthermore, the journal peer-review process is an essential element of publication because no writer could identify and address all potential issues with a manuscript.ġ. Writing for academic journals is a highly competitive activity, and it’s important to understand that there could be several reasons behind a rejection. While there are several types of research articles, such as short communications, review papers and so forth, these guidelines focus on preparing a full article (including a literature review), whether based on qualitative or quantitative methodology, from the perspective of the management, education, information sciences and social sciences disciplines. In this article, intended for doctoral students and other young scholars, I identify common pitfalls and offer helpful solutions to prepare more impactful papers. Being aware of these shortcomings will increase your chances of having your manuscript published and also boost your research profile and career progression. In my seven years of research and teaching, I have observed several shortcomings in the manuscript preparation and submission process that often lead to research being rejected for publication. Then we submit our manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.įor many, this is the hardest part of research. As we write up our findings, we aim to provide theoretical insight, and share theoretical and practical implications about our work. We come up with what we believe are unique hypotheses, base our work on robust data and use an appropriate research methodology. ![]() ![]() As scholars, we strive to do high-quality research that will advance science. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |